logo
About Us
Issues
Resources
Newsroom
Contact Us
 
fma1
banner
Press Coverage

Cigarette tax may light up

Los Angeles Daily News
December 14, 2005
By Harrison Sheppard

SACRAMENTO--Cigarettes in California would become the most expensive in the nation under a ballot measure proposed Tuesday by a coalition of health groups.

The measure would increase cigarette taxes by $2.60 a pack and generate about $2.3 billion in revenue for a range of health programs, including hospital emergency services, children's health insurance and cancer research.

Current taxes on cigarettes in California are 87 cents a pack, bringing the average price to about $3.95.

"It distributes the funds in a well-thought-out and comprehensive array of health programs that will make a frontal assault on the major diseases and causes of death in California, maintain and expand access to health care, and improve the health of all Californians," said Jim Knox, vice president of the American Cancer Society, one of the measure's sponsors.

Tobacco industry officials said the highest state tax on cigarettes is Rhode Island's $2.46 a pack. With the new tax, California's cigarette tax would total $3.47 per pack.

The measure - sponsors now have to submit 598,105 valid signatures to place it on the November 2006 ballot - represents a compromise between two competing proposals that would have imposed taxes of $1 or $1.50 a pack.

Differences had mainly focused on how the funds would be distributed, with one proposal by the hospital industry focusing more on emergency services and the other focusing more on health care and prevention programs.

Most tobacco companies and taxpayer groups are expected to fight the measure.

John Singleton, communications director for R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., said the current tax costs California smokers more than $1 billion a year.

"That's an enormous amount of money that's coming from a relatively small portion of the population in California," Singleton said. "And not only is it a minority of the population, but it's a minority of the population that tends to be low- and moderate-income."

The tobacco industry no longer has a central trade organization - it was disbanded as part of the 1998 settlement with the various state attorneys general - so each company will make its own decision whether to get involved in the campaign.

The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association is also concerned about the proposal.

Association President Jon Coupal said higher taxes just lead to more efforts to avoid them - such as purchasing cigarettes online, on an Indian reservation or through the black market.

"We think that California has sufficient revenue to conduct the programs it needs to conduct," Coupal said. "A higher tax is not necessary."

The measure is backed by more than a dozen health organizations, including the American Cancer Society, the California Hospital Association and the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids.